Pet Industry News Current Issue Exclusives Classified Ads Marketplaces Industry People & Profiles Pet Industry Resource Center
6:30 AM   April 27, 2015
Click Here to Subscribe
Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
How many of your customers ask about the safety of the food and treats they buy?
Click Here for Complete Breed & Species Profiles
Bookmark and Share
PIJAC Expects Long Battle over Proposed Python Ban

Posted Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 7:32 p.m., EST

The Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council urged members to respond, but remain “calm” and “professional,” to recently proposed Federal legislation that would ban the importation and interstate commerce of the entire Python genera.

Introduced by U.S. Senator Bill Nelson (D-Florida), Senate Bill S. 373 would add “constrictor snake of the species Python genera” to the Lacey Act, which prohibits the importation and interstate trade of species determined to be injurious to people, agriculture, horticulture, forestry or wildlife.

The Lacey Act also requires importers or consignees to “promptly” export or destroy any prohibited animals or eggs at their own expense.

Nelson cited concerns about the environmental impact on endangered species a feral population of Burmese pythons was causing in the Everglades region of south Florida, noting “If we do not take action now, we will let python populations in Florida continue to grow and further ravage the already-fragile Everglades, as well as risk letting them spread throughout the Southern portion of the United States.”

Nelson acknowledged that Florida in 2008 had implemented a “reptiles of concern” program, which required owners of pythons and other snakes to obtain permits for their animals, and implant tracking microchips into larger pythons. However, he felt additional efforts were necessary.

In a PetAlert issued Feb. 17, 2009, PIJAC warned that the bill was problematic for several reasons and would directly impact pet stores, exporters, breeders and pet owners across the country. PIJAC believes thousands of businesses—breeders, pet stores and manufacturers currently sell pythons and python-care related products, and it has began conducting a survey to determine potential economic damages to the reptile industry and snake keepers.

That survey will be posted within the S. 373 Forum on PIJAC’s website. PIJAC plans to post future updates on the legislation on the special forum as well. The forum also posts the actual legislation and the contact information for Senators who members may seek to contact.

PIJAC has created a similar forum for HR 669: The Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act. That legislation would essentially direct the Fish and Wildlife Service to develop a list of species that can be imported into the United States, thereby banning others. (PIJAC has been monitoring this bill and expects a long battle and therefore encourages calm and professional responses from industry participants to maintain the industry’s credibility.)

One major concern was that the proposed python legislation unilaterally bans every species of python without a scientific risk assessment, despite the rationale behind the legislation being the feral population of a single species: Burmese pythons.

Moreover, the bill ignores an ongoing risk analysis being conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. That analysis seeks to determine which, if any, species of pythons, boas and Eunectes warrant listing as injurious wildlife under the Lacey Act. The analysis would provide a scientific basis for any listings and would provide for a public comment period, unlike the proposed legislation that would circumvent the public rule-making process, PIJAC said.   

PIJAC estimates millions of pythons from nearly one dozen species have been imported into the United States during the past 50 years, and only the Burmese python has established a feral population. Moreover, PIJAC contends that several factors combined to help establish that population, including a “mass” escape of pythons from holding facilities destroyed during Hurricane Andrew in 1992, additional but isolated escapes from pet owners and commercial facilities; misguided release by pet owners; the subtropical climate and large area of swampy habitat with relatively little human activity, and ample prey availability in the Everglades region. 

A lack of proven methods for python trapping and a lack of funding for research and staffing to actually trap or eradicate pythons compounds the challenge, PIJAC reported.

In addition, efforts such as Florida’s permitting program and related Nonnative Pet Amnesty Days, and PIJAC’s Habitattitude campaign against releasing unwanted pets should help prevent the additional release or escape of pythons, PIJAC contends.

PIJAC further believes the ban on interstate transport or trade could result in the release or euthanasia of hundreds of thousands of pythons as python owners (commercial and hobbyist) attempt to comply with the law.

The bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. <HOME>

 Give us your opinion on
PIJAC Expects Long Battle over Proposed Python Ban

Submit a Comment

Industry Professional Site: Comments from non-industry professionals will be removed.

Reader Comments
No no no! This bill is so wrong! If only these people werent blind they'd see how many mass breeders and hobbiests there are in this country! Dont get me wrong, I see the good intent put forward but, there would be thousands of snakes let go into the wild, SO many would be euthanized, and huge businesses would go out of business so suddenly! I dont think that passing this bill will destroy the econemy but it deffinatley WILL promote 'underground' breeding and the harmless pets like Ball Pythons will be included! If you are going to make a bill on DEADLY pets, make it for croc moniters and reticulated pythons! Not household pets! Morons with power make me EXTREEMLY mad!
Morgan, McHenry, IL
Posted: 3/10/2010 7:12:14 PM
Florida's native wildlife is in peril of so many exotic species roaming the state, 192 exotics to be exact. And the most problematic of those exotic species are the large constrictors. According to the WMD, 4 large constrictors have established populations in South Florida. In order to prevent further damage, I want the large constrictors to be listed as injurious animals and stop their importation into this country. This will help the animals in their native range too as less will be captured in the wild. Maybe their poplulations can rebound where these 4 snakes have suffered because of the pet trade. These 4 snakes are the burmese, north indian rock, yellow anaconda & boa constrictor. Please understand that stopping the importation of these snakes is best for the snakes & best for Florida's native wildlife. I can't imagine what Florida is going to look like in just 30 years with all our other exotic animal & plant problems. Its like a huge science experiment.
Brian, Bradenton, FL
Posted: 2/15/2010 8:23:41 PM
I would like to ban all non-native animals from this country if they pass this herptephobic law. let's start with all dogs and cats.
The people who make these laws are afraid of snakes and would like to ban ALL animals that they deem are undesirable-to them anyway.
Deborah, Miami, FL
Posted: 8/25/2009 11:02:52 PM
View Current Comments

Copyright ©  PPN, LLC. All rights reserved.