Pet Industry News Current Issue Exclusives Classified Ads Marketplaces Industry People & Profiles Pet Industry Resource Center
5:35 PM   February 08, 2012
Your E-mail:
What is your store’s preferred source for ordering products?
Click Here to Subscribe
Subscriber Services
Click Here for Complete Breed & Species Profiles
Product Finder
Bookmark and Share
California Commission to Hear Non-Native Species Issues
Posted: Monday, March 1, 2010, 4:43 p.m., EST

California Commission to Hear Non-Native Species IssuesThe California Fish and Game Commission is poised to consider two items at its March 3 meeting that address non-native frogs and turtles. In a statement, the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC) said these agenda items are not likely to lead to an immediate ban on the importation, possession or trade of all non-native amphibian and turtles. However, PIJAC warned that the commission could start a process that would lead to such a ban.

“While PIJAC does not believe that it is the intent of the commission or the department (of fish and game) to adopt such simplistic solutions, we must remain vigilant and be heard or the eventual outcome of the upcoming meeting could lead to such a result,” PIJAC said in the statement.

Agenda Item 12 calls for the commission to consider an act on “Draft Finding Regarding the Detrimental Effects of Non-Native Frogs and Turtles.” PIJAC said it has not been able to determine whether these draft findings will be made public prior to the meeting. PIJAC expects the findings will be revealed orally during the meeting and possibly handed out immediately prior to the start of the meeting.

The commission heard the testimony at its Feb. 3 meeting regarding possible options to control non-native frogs and turtles. Several members of the public spoke in support of a ban on all non-native amphibians and turtles. Click here to view a video of the meeting.

Agenda Item 14 calls for the commission to hear public testimony on a series of proposed amendments to state regulations that address restricted species permits and requirements. The proposal includes adding several species to the list of restricted species, such as Bufo marinus, Bufo paracnemis, Bufo horribilis (giant toad or marine toad group), all large toads from Mexico and South America and Eleutherodactylus coqui (common Coqui or Coqui frog), according to PIJAC. Click here to view the proposed rule changes.

According to PIJAC, the adverse economic impact of the pet industry would be enormous if the commission or the state department of fish and game were to adopt wholesale species bans or adopt a burdensome and costly permit system. The organization is calling on interested industry members, hobbyists and pet owners to attend the March 3 meeting and present their concerns. <HOME>

 Give us your opinion on
California Commission to Hear Non-Native Species Issues

Submit a Comment

Industry Professional Site: Comments from non-industry professionals will be removed.

Reader Comments
The Commission voted 5:0 NOT to issue any future permits for the importation of live turtles and frogs for California's many live food markets. Currently, California imports TWO MILLION American bullfrogs (commercially-raised in Taiwan), and 300,000-400,000 turtles (red-eared sliders and spiny softshells, ALL taken from the wild) for human consumption. These animals are commonly (though illegally) released into the wild, where they prey upon and displace the native species. More than 25 necropsies in recent years have shown all the market turtles and frogs to be diseased and/or parasitized (E. coli, salmonella, pasturella, giardia, blood parasites, even one case of malaria). It is ILLEGAL to sell such products for human consumption. Responsible pet owners should be leading the charge to stop this horrendous commerce (the animals are often butchered while fully conscious).

We took this issue to the Commission 15 years (!) ago. At that time they voted 4:0 NOT to impose a ban, but simply to post a few signs in the markets, even though they received more than 2,000 letters in support of a ban, many from major sporting and environmental groups. Kudos to today's Commissioners--they did the right thing, finally.
Sincerely,
Eric Mills, coordinator
ACTION FOR ANIMALS
Oakland, CA
e-mail - afa@mcn.org
eric mills, oakland, CA
Posted: 3/3/2010 11:18:34 PM
View Current Comments

Pet Product News Digital Edition
Become a Fan of Pet Product News  International
Follow us on Twitter
Copyright ©  BowTie, Inc. All rights reserved.
Our Privacy Policy has changed.
Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights.
Terms of Use | Guidelines for Participation
Disclaimer: The posts and threads recorded in our messageboards do not reflect the opinions of nor are endorsed by BowTie, Inc., Animal Network nor any of its employees. We are not responsible for the content of these posts and threads.